The test was conducted by using a built-in frame rate measuring command (“Test.time_display”) available via the Ruby console in the desktop version.
BUY SKETCHUP PRO SERIES
It’s closest rival in the Quadro series is the P1000. It beats out the P2200 from time to time in various applications at a good discount of the price. The RTX 2060 is the current-best budget option for DirectX-focused applications. The RTX 2070 SUPER is our bread and butter mid to high end 3D rendering card, offering a solid step up from the P2200 without requiring almost doubling the price to get to the RTX 2080 SUPER or the RTX 4000 GeForce RTX 2060 It will be replaced by the new generation of RTX 3000 Series cards in the not so distant future, but for the meantime it has served us well. The RTX 2080 SUPER is close to the top end of our gaming and rendering cards for DirectX-focused applications, beaten out only by the GeForce RTX 2080 TI for specialty applications.
The P400 is the cheapest card that we offer, we typically only recommend it to customers that have little to no 3D needs and are mostly focused on 2D CAD applications. The P620 is our favorite card for cost-effective performance and basic 3D capabilities without breaking the bank.
BUY SKETCHUP PRO UPGRADE
It’s our go-to choice for customers that are looking for an upgrade to the basic performance of the P620 but aren’t quite ready to go all the way to the P2200. The P1000 exists in a little bit of a limbo. The P2200 is the most recently launched addition to the Quadro series and serves as our typical mid to high end Quadro card for 3D OpenGL-oriented applications. It blows every card we tested here out of the water other than the GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. The RTX 4000 is the first step in the RTX line of the professional-oriented Quadro series and is nothing to sneeze at when you want to start talking about real graphics performance. We tested SketchUp with a wide span of GPUs that included all of the standard options that we offer. The desktop app is also more fully-featured and allowed us to better isolate the resources that SketchUp uses as well as offering a built-in test to measure frame rate.īuy your preconfigured SketchUp workstation at one of these links: The web and desktop version appear to have similar if not identical engines, so you can apply our results for either case when making decisions on your hardware. One thing of note is that we used the desktop version to carry out our tests, as it showed similar performance results to the web application. For example, testing with an Intel i9-10900K processor didn’t make much of a difference.īecause of these limitations, we decided to focus on catering our tests to finding the most realistic and inexpensive SketchUp configurations rather than trying to push the limits of the software. Furthermore when we tested SketchUp with some seriously powerful hardware, it hit the same bottlenecks that didn’t seem to change from any of our parameters.
SketchUp uses some balance of the CPU and GPU to achieve its modeling, but further testing would be required to determine its exact behavior. SketchUp has proven itself challenging to narrow down the exact hardware parameters to achieve maximum performance. From a computer performance perspective, there are some odd quirks that come as a result of its need to be web-compatible. It competes with other online CAD modeling platforms such as Fusion 360 and Onshape. SketchUp is a somewhat unconventional piece of CAD software.
0 kommentar(er)
