Legal testimony against Philip Morris Co in class action law suits in NY, MA and CA.
Research funging International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (IELCAP) 2001-2017. When lung cancer is detected by screening.vi Small and must be balanced against the substantial long-term survival benefit RERF data should reassure those at high risk of lung cancer that the chance ofĭeveloping an "excess" cancer, following annual CT lung cancer screening, is very Is minimal, if any, increased attributable risk of future excess cancer for a middle-aged or elderly adult participating in a CT screening program. With average radiation exposure from a low-dose, non-contrast, spiral CT scan ofĪpproximately 1 milli-Sievert, an individual screened for lung cancer over aĭecade has 10 milli-Sievert total exposure. The range 0-100 mS, was very small and not statistically significant. Less than 1.05% and that any attributable cancers would appear 15-40 years afterīrenner (2003) reported that measured attributable risk, in the lower bounds of The Science graphic however shows attributable risk of cancer caused by singleĮxposure to 0.1 Gray (approximately 100 milli-Sieverts) in adults aged fifty, to be ii NCI investigators (2009) used mathematical modeling based upon the linear no-threshold hypothesis of radiation carcinogenesis to predict that diagnostic CT scans could cause more than 29,000 major cancers. Brenner (2004) estimated that CT screening over 25 years would cause 36,000 excess lung cancers and and outweigh survival benefit. The graphic depiction of data is highly relevant to questions regarding safety of diagnostic radiology. Seventy-five years of carcinogenesis research on long-term radiation risk following atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, from the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF). Understanding of radiation's impacts" Science, Jul. Dennis Normile, ("How atomic bomb survivors have transformed our
0 kommentar(er)
